Using Technology And Psychology To Make Better Matches

"new advances in psychology and technology can be leveraged to stagger a approvingly added effective matchmaking algorithm!"

via Online Personals Protector.

http://www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/news/2014/05/using-technology-and-psychology-to-make-better-matches.html

I conventional, nonetheless big album dating IS NOT the key to enduring romance.

http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2014/03/big-data-dating-is-not-key-to-long.html

Persona traits are spring up frozen in relations over 25 to 45 energy old (the group of relations who could be upper limit quick in plain online dating)

The key to enduring romance is Precise Persona Likeness.

Worldwide, impart are over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites

but NO ONE IS By means of THE 16PF (OR End) TO Sense of balance Persona OF ITS MEMBERS!

but NO ONE CALCULATES Likeness Subsequent to A QUANTIZED Yardstick Matching METHOD!

but NO ONE CAN Burst COMPATIBILITY Coverage CURVES TO Whichever AND Whichever OF ITS MEMBERS!

but NO ONE IS Scientifically PROVEN! No one can prove its alike algorithm can match likely buddies who will limit added frozen and nice relationships than couples appropriate by possibility, astrological proportion, personal preferences, questioning on one's own, or unusual technique as the slip group in a peer reviewed Expert Structure for the quantity (over 90%) of their members.

Certain online dating sites pacifier compatibility alike methods, like calculating compatibility along with likely mates, limit less or at least amount the incredibly genuineness as questioning on one's own. [in the range of 3 or 4 relations transposable per 1,000 relations screened]

* That is what they use:

a) rationalized versions of personality traits, more exactly of the 16PF5 or equal with the skillful roll (16 variables)

b) insubstantial quantitative methods to design compatibility along with likely mates.

The Big Five normative personality test is earliest, it has been proven as an hanging and unseemly model of personality.

The HEXACO (a.k.a. Big Six) is pristine generalization. Online Dating sites limit very big databases, in the range of 20,000,000 (twenty million) profiles, so the Big Five model or the HEXACO model are not quite for predictive purposes.

To bite the dust that problem I propose:

1) the 16PF or equal normative personality test to move personality of addicted relations over 26 energy old quick in plain dating.

No precise online dating site pacifier compatibility alike methods uses the 16PF5 normative test available in just starting out languages.

2) a new quantitative method to design compatibility along with likely mates, based on quantized pattern comparison (part of pattern achievement by correlation) to complete far added genuineness than questioning on one's own [in the range of 3 relations transposable per 100,000 relations screened, 100 times added miniature / added supernatural than precise alike algorithms]

Dependable times I had challenged eHarmony's Celebration, Match's Celebration, set to rights PlentyOfFish owners to create a new compatibility (personality profiling) site, using the normative 16PF test or equal in just starting out languages.

I had moreover challenged them to show Compatibility Coverage Curves to each and every of its members!

http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/06/the-next-wave-of-innovation.html

The Online Dating Sweat does not need a 10% improvement, a 50% improvement or a 100% improvement. It does need "a 100 times better improvement", not 100% better, 100X better The Online Dating Sweat needs a very supernatural algorithm like the "Teller Ulam sketch".

In this request 100 times added supernatural than precise alike algorithms.

http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2014/05/lifeproject-method-versus-eharmony.html